From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horne v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 2, 2012
98 A.D.3d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-08-2

In the Matter of Reginald HORNE, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Reginald Horne, Alden, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.



Reginald Horne, Alden, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., MERCURE, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and EGAN JR., JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After a correction sergeant received confidential information that petitioner had a weapon in his cell, his cell was searched and a broken toothbrush with a sharpened tweezer half taped to the handle was discovered secreted between two boxes underneath petitioner's bed. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon, possessing an altered item and possessing contraband. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's claim, we do not find that there are significant gaps in the hearing transcript that prevent meaningful review ( see Matter of Povoski v. Fischer, 93 A.D.3d 963, 964, 939 N.Y.S.2d 724 [2012];Matter of Fragosa v. Moore, 93 A.D.3d 979, 979, 939 N.Y.S.2d 668 [2012] ). The misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony of the correction officers involved in the search, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Alache v. Fischer, 91 A.D.3d 1240, 1241, 937 N.Y.S.2d 458 [2012];Matter of Parra v. Fischer, 76 A.D.3d 724, 725, 907 N.Y.S.2d 345 [2010],lv. denied15 N.Y.3d 714, 2010 WL 4823841 [2010] ). While petitioner argues that the Hearing Officer failed to independently assess the credibility of the confidential source, this was not necessary as the determination at issue was not based upon the confidential information but rather upon the evidence establishing that petitioner had a weapon in his cell ( see Matter of Nimmons v. Fischer, 68 A.D.3d 1311, 890 N.Y.S.2d 202 [2009];Matter of Terrence v. Fischer, 64 A.D.3d 1110, 884 N.Y.S.2d 277 [2009] ). Likewise, as the report was sufficiently detailed to give petitioner notice of the charges to enable him to prepare a defense, we reject petitioner's claim that the misbehavior report was defective because it failed to reference the confidential information prompting the search ( see Matter of Quezada v. Fischer, 85 A.D.3d 1462, 1462, 925 N.Y.S.2d 726 [2011];Matter of Cody v. Fischer, 84 A.D.3d 1651, 1651, 923 N.Y.S.2d 910 [2011] ). Lastly, petitioner's claim of inadequate employee assistance has not been preserved for our review ( see Matter of Cespedes v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 68 A.D.3d 1429, 1430, 68 A.D.3d 1429 [2009] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Horne v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 2, 2012
98 A.D.3d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Horne v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Reginald HORNE, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 2, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
949 N.Y.S.2d 814
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5884

Citing Cases

Telesford v. Annucci

The misbehavior report, written documentation that was recovered from petitioner's cell and hearing testimony…

Shufelt v. Annucci

Further, while petitioner preserved his claim that the Hearing Officer failed to independently assess the…