Opinion
Case No: 1:07-CV-110 TC.
October 5, 2009
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL
Plaintiff Susan Hornbuckle has filed a motion requesting that Defendant Adecco USA, Inc., be compelled to produce a company representative pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) to provide deposition testimony about certain topics. Adecco has filed an opposition. The factual background for Hornbuckle's motion is set forth more fully in the parties' memoranda.
Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify Order and Compel Discovery, docket no. 32, filed September 21, 2009.
Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify Order and Compel Discovery (Opposition Memorandum), docket no. 38, filed October 1, 2009.
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify Order and Compel Discovery at 1-4, docket no. 33, filed September 21, 2009; Opposition Memorandum at 1-4.
After carefully considering the parties' submissions, the court rules as follows:
The Motion to compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Topics 1-11 are improper at this time for the reasons stated in the court's order of May 23, 2009.
Topic 12 is stricken.
Topic 13 shall be treated as a contention interrogatory and shall be answered on or before October 13, 2009.
Topic 14 is stricken.
Topics 1-5 on Deposition Day 3 ("DD3") are stricken.
Docket no. 27.