From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 25, 2016
190 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D14–3930.

04-25-2016

Luther Arthur HORN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Ryan Thomas Truskoski of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Ryan Thomas Truskoski of Ryan Thomas Truskoski, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Luther Arthur Horn, III, challenges an order dismissing his motion for return of property seized as part of a criminal investigation. The trial court properly dismissed the motion because Horn's appeal of his judgment and sentence was pending. However, now that his appeal has been resolved, Horn v. State, 171 So.3d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), we remand the case for the trial court to consider the motion on the merits. See Rightmire v. State, 1 So.3d 1191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

REMANDED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Horn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 25, 2016
190 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Horn v. State

Case Details

Full title:Luther Arthur HORN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 25, 2016

Citations

190 So. 3d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Horn v. State

Even where the trial court properly denied the motion for return of property during a pending appeal, once…