From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horkins v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
No. 3:09-cv-00784 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:09-cv-00784

11-30-2012

MAXWELL G. HORKINS, III, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge


ORDER

The parties to this action have filed a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice in the above-captioned case. (Doc. No. 15.) Having reached a settlement, they request the Court to dismiss all claims with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Id.) Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Horkins v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
No. 3:09-cv-00784 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Horkins v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAXWELL G. HORKINS, III, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2012

Citations

No. 3:09-cv-00784 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2012)