From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horace v. Horace

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 1, 2013
NO. 01-11-00634-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 01-11-00634-CV

2013-10-01

DARRELL LYNELL HORACE, Appellant v. CHRISTI DIANE HORACE, Appellee


On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2011-27942


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Darrell Lynell Horace, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, Horace filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c). No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. And, although appellant failed to include a certificate of conference in his motion, more than 10 days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Horace attached an affidavit of indigence to his motion to dismiss this appeal. This affidavit does not constitute an adequate response to our notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, however, because Horace has previously filed an affidavit of indigence in the trial court, which was contested and for which the trial court issued an order sustaining the contest, and the rules do not allow for the filing of multiple affidavits of indigence. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c) (requiring affidavit of indigence be filed "with or before the notice of appeal"), 20.1(m) (authorizing appellate court to order party to pay all or portion of appellate costs if party who has proceeded on appeal without prepayment of costs gains ability to pay); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring fees be paid "at the time an item is presented for filing"), 35.1 (setting deadline for filing of appellate record), 35.3 (requiring trial court clerk and court reporter to file respective records if party responsible for paying for records has paid appropriate fees).

Accordingly, we grant Horace's motion and dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.


Summaries of

Horace v. Horace

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Oct 1, 2013
NO. 01-11-00634-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Horace v. Horace

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL LYNELL HORACE, Appellant v. CHRISTI DIANE HORACE, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Oct 1, 2013

Citations

NO. 01-11-00634-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2013)