From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopson v. Ernie's General Store, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 20, 2013
2:13-1568 WBS DAD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013)

Opinion


WILLIAM HOPSON and CYNTHIA HOPSON, Plaintiffs, v. ERNIE'S GENERAL STORE, INC.; ERNEST GIANNECCHINI TRUST; and Does 1-5, Defendants. No. 2:13-1568 WBS DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. December 20, 2013

          ORDER RE: SANCTIONS

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         In response to this court's Order to Show Cause of November 27, 2013, (Docket No. 13), counsel for defendants Michael Babitzke submitted a letter explaining his failure to attend the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. (Docket No. 15.) In the letter, Babitzke took "full responsibility" for the failure, and noted that he "simply failed to notice and calendar the pretrial scheduling conference." (Id.)

         The court has the authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f) to impose sanctions for even unintentional or negligent noncompliance with the court's pretrial orders. See, e.g., Lucas Auto. Eng'g, Inc. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 275 F.3d 762, 769 (9th Cir. 2001) (upholding Rule 16 sanctions imposed on a party for unintentionally failing to attend a scheduled mediation due to an incapacitating headache); Ayers v. City of Richmond, 895 F.2d 1267, 1270 (9th Cir. 1990) (upholding sanctions under Rule 16(f) where counsel failed to appear for a settlement conference because the date "slipped by him"). Rule 16(f) also allows a court to order a party, its attorney, or both to pay reasonable expenses incurred because of noncompliance with the rule. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f)(2); see also, e.g., Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d 1385, 1397 (9th Cir. 1993) (upholding award of fees incurred because of party's failure to comply with court's order.)

         Mr. Babitzke's failure to participate in the filing of a joint status report and subsequent failure to appear at the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference violated the terms of the court's July 31, 2013, Order re: Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. (Docket No. 4.) Because Mr. Babitzke's failure consumed the time of opposing counsel as well as the court, the court will order Mr. Babitzke to compensate opposing counsel a reasonable sum for his time. Accordingly, Mr. Babitzke will be required send payment of $100 to counsel for plaintiffs, Daniel Malakauskas. If Mr. Malakauskas wishes to waive receipt of the payment, the court will not further enforce this Order. Under the circumstances, the court will not require Mr. Babitzke to pay additional sanctions to the court.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within ten days of the date this Order is signed, defendants' counsel Michael Babitzke shall send payment in the amount of $100 to plaintiffs' counsel Daniel Malakauskas or request that the matter be scheduled for a formal hearing.


Summaries of

Hopson v. Ernie's General Store, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 20, 2013
2:13-1568 WBS DAD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Hopson v. Ernie's General Store, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HOPSON and CYNTHIA HOPSON, Plaintiffs, v. ERNIE'S GENERAL STORE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 20, 2013

Citations

2:13-1568 WBS DAD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013)