From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopson v. Casas

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Aug 25, 2015
1:15-cv-00813-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2015)

Opinion

          DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, Stockton, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff.

          GREGORY J. GOODWIN, Modesto, CA, Attorney for Defendants.


          STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH ORDER GRANTING THEREOF [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41]

          SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action through their designated counsel, that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety, WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fee's in connection with the lawsuit and the negotiation and preparation of any agreement entered into by such parties.

          ORDER

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that this action be dismissed, WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hopson v. Casas

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Aug 25, 2015
1:15-cv-00813-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Hopson v. Casas

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA HOPSON, Plaintiff, v. ROSA CASAS, as an individual, and dba as…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division

Date published: Aug 25, 2015

Citations

1:15-cv-00813-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2015)