From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District
May 26, 1981
420 N.E.2d 895 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981)

Summary

explaining that, in a criminal case, a sentence is a final judgment

Summary of this case from Ballard v. State

Opinion

No. 3-281A34.

May 26, 1981.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Allen County, Philip R. Thieme, J.

Richard J. Thonert, Romero Thonert, Fort Wayne, for appellant.

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Michael Gene Wordon, Deputy Atty. Gen., C. Ambrose Ramsey, Research Assistant, Indianapolis, for appellee.


Jonathan W. Hopkins attempts to appeal from a finding of guilty in a criminal proceeding brought in two (2) counts. On the first count, No Operator's License, the defendant was fined $10.00 and costs and no appeal is made from that judgment. On the second count, Driving Under the Influence, the Motion to Correct Errors and hence the appeal are premature. See C.R. 16. The defendant has never been sentenced. The defendant was found guilty on October 22, 1980 on both counts. He was sentenced on Count One (No Operator's License) on that date. The Record of Proceedings was filed with us on February 2, 1981. Sentencing on Count Two (Driving Under the Influence) was set for February 20, 1981. Thus, we have no final judgment and this cause is dismissed pursuant to A.R. 4.

CHIPMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hopkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District
May 26, 1981
420 N.E.2d 895 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981)

explaining that, in a criminal case, a sentence is a final judgment

Summary of this case from Ballard v. State
Case details for

Hopkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN W. HOPKINS, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW), v. STATE OF INDIANA…

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District

Date published: May 26, 1981

Citations

420 N.E.2d 895 (Ind. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Ballard v. State

Thus, it appears that his motion was premature because the trial court had not yet entered a sentence or…