Summary
remanding for award of benefits where the ALJ rejected the report of the plaintiff's treating neurologist in favor of a non-examining internist
Summary of this case from Sucharski v. AstrueOpinion
Case No. 1:07-cv-964.
May 14, 2009
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed April 15, 2009 (Doc. 11).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. This action is REVERSED pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and REMANDED for a determination of the appropriate onset date and an award of benefits.