From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Apadaca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 4, 2012
Case No. 1:10-cv-166-SJM-SPB (W.D. Pa. Jun. 4, 2012)

Summary

holding that a deprivation of five meals over a two-month period, or "roughly one of every twelve meals" was not sufficiently serious

Summary of this case from Cadet v. Quigley

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-166-SJM-SPB

06-04-2012

KENTLIN HOPKINS, Plaintiff, v. LT. APADACA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM JUDGMENT ORDER

Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on July 9, 2010 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on May 10, 2012 [84], recommends that the Defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted.

Plaintiff was allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service in which to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI-Forest, where he is incarcerated. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date. Accordingly, after de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 4th Day of June, 2012;

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment [80] shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED. Accordingly, JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the remaining Defendants and against the Plaintiff, Kentlin Hopkins.

The Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Baxter on May 10, 2012 [84] is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

____________________

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

United States District Judge
cm: All parties of record

U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Apadaca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 4, 2012
Case No. 1:10-cv-166-SJM-SPB (W.D. Pa. Jun. 4, 2012)

holding that a deprivation of five meals over a two-month period, or "roughly one of every twelve meals" was not sufficiently serious

Summary of this case from Cadet v. Quigley
Case details for

Hopkins v. Apadaca

Case Details

Full title:KENTLIN HOPKINS, Plaintiff, v. LT. APADACA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 4, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-166-SJM-SPB (W.D. Pa. Jun. 4, 2012)

Citing Cases

Prater v. Wetzel

Courts in the Third Circuit have repeatedly held that periods of time less than three years in administrative…

Nifas v. Coleman

Therefore, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted with respect to Plaintiff's excessive…