From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hope v. Lipkin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 22, 1963
156 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

Opinion

No. 63-544.

October 15, 1963. Rehearing Denied October 22, 1963.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Lucien C. Proby, Jr., J.

Helen Tanos Hope, and Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for appellants.

C.H. McWilliams, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


The right to attorneys' fees is derivative in nature when representing the wife in a divorce action. See: Smith v. Smith, 90 Fla. 824, 107 So. 257. Counsel for the wife have attempted to take an appeal in their individual names and not on behalf of the wife. Never having been parties of record in the trial court, they have no standing to prosecute such an appeal. See: Salomon v. Taylor, 50 Fla. 608, 39 So. 48; King v. Brown, Fla. 1951, 55 So.2d 187; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 55. Therefore, same is hereby dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Hope v. Lipkin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 22, 1963
156 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
Case details for

Hope v. Lipkin

Case Details

Full title:HELEN TANOS HOPE AND ALFRED D. BIELEY, APPELLANTS, v. LEO H. LIPKIN AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 22, 1963

Citations

156 So. 2d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

Citing Cases

Valparaiso Bank Trust Co. v. Sims

Finally, we recognize that a fee money award is payable by one spouse to the other as an indemnity for fees…

Tubbs v. Mechanik Nuccio Hearne & Wester, P.A.

As counsel for RC Highlands, Mechanik Nuccio had no independent right to fees and costs separate and apart…