From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hope Med. Enters. v. Fagron Compounding Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2022
2:19-cv-07748-CAS(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-07748-CAS(PLAx)

01-18-2022

HOPE MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A HOPE PHARMACEUTICALS, Plaintiff, v. FAGRON COMPOUNDING SERVICES, LLC; JCB LABORATORIES, LLC; ANAZAOHEALTH CORPORATION; COAST QUALITY PHARMACY, LLC, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

THE HONORABLE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that judgment be, and hereby is, entered as follows:

1. Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Hope Medical Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Hope Pharmaceuticals ("Hope").

2. Declaratory Relief. Defendants Fagron Compounding Services, LLC, JCB Laboratories, LLC, AnazaoHealth Corporation, and Coast Quality Pharmacy LLC (collectively "defendants") have violated (1) California's Unfair Competition Law, (2) Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, (3) Tennessee's Consumer Protection Act, (4) South Carolina's Unfair Trade Practices Act, and (5) Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practices Act.

3. Permanent Injunction. Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all those acting in concert with any of them, shall be permanently enjoined from directly or indirectly dispensing or distributing any compounded sodium thiosulfate product from a Section 503B outsourcing facility into California, Connecticut, Florida, South Carolina, or Tennessee, unless:

a. defendants are provided with an individual clinic order form for the product; and
b. the order form includes an attestation specifically indicating that defendants' compounded product, which does not contain potassium, will produce a clinical difference; and
c. the attestation specifies why the defendants' compounded product, rather than the comparable commercially available drug product, is "medically necessary" for the specified patients to whom defendants' drug will be distributed or dispensed; and
d. the attestation indicates that it is made or approved by the prescribing practitioners of such specified patients.

An order that only identifies the product formulation, without more information, is insufficient to comply with this injunction.

4. Attorney's Fees and Costs. Attorney's fees are awarded to Hope in accordance with the Court's Order dated January 14, 2022. Any application or motion by plaintiff shall be submitted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and Local Rule 54.

5. Service of this Judgment. This Judgment shall be deemed to have seen served upon defendants when distributed through the ECF system o:: the United States District Court.

6. Notice Provision. Defendants shall be required to notify purchasers of their compounded drug that the drug is compounded under Section 503B anc as such each order must be made or approved by the prescribing practitioner o" specified patients and must contain a statement of clinical difference as definec in Section 503B. Some examples of clinical difference statements fron the FDA Guidance on Section 503B include:

a. "Liquid form, compounded drug will be prescribed to patients who can't swallow tablet (if the comparable drug is a tablet)";
b. "Dilution for infusion solution to be administered to patients who need this formulation during surgery (if the comparable drug is not available at that concentration, pre-mixed with the particular diluent in an infusion bag)";
c. "1 mg, pediatric patients need lower dose (if the comparable drug is only available in 25 mg dose)".

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.


Summaries of

Hope Med. Enters. v. Fagron Compounding Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2022
2:19-cv-07748-CAS(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Hope Med. Enters. v. Fagron Compounding Servs.

Case Details

Full title:HOPE MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A HOPE PHARMACEUTICALS, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-07748-CAS(PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2022)