From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooker v. Clendenin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2023
1:23-cv-00969-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00969-EPG (PC)

07-19-2023

CAMERON HOOKER, Plaintiff, v. STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(ECF No. 5)

Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000)

In the instant action, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5). Examination of these documents reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hooker v. Clendenin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2023
1:23-cv-00969-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Hooker v. Clendenin

Case Details

Full title:CAMERON HOOKER, Plaintiff, v. STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00969-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2023)