From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 9, 2001
34 S.W.3d 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77407

January 9, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RALLS COUNTY, HONORABLE GLENN A. NORTON

S. Paige Canfield; 1221 Locust, Suite 350; St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Attorney General, Susan L. Brown; Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899; Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



Stuart Hood ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hood v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 9, 2001
34 S.W.3d 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Hood v. State

Case Details

Full title:STUART LEE HOOD, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 9, 2001

Citations

34 S.W.3d 870 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)