Hood v. Amgen, Inc.

Full title: Teresa Hood, Plaintiff, v. Amgen, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 5, 2023

2:18-CV-02981-WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:18-CV-02981-WBS-AC

06-05-2023

Teresa Hood, Plaintiff, v. Amgen, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Aaron T. Goodman BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP Attorney for Defendant AMGEN INC. M. Anderson Berry CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, A PROFESSIONAL CORP. Pro Hac Vice Application Pending: David B. Joeckel, Jr. THE JOECKEL LAW OFFICE Attorneys for Plaintiff TERESA HOOD.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Aaron T. Goodman BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP Attorney for Defendant AMGEN INC.

M. Anderson Berry CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, A PROFESSIONAL CORP. Pro Hac Vice Application Pending: David B. Joeckel, Jr. THE JOECKEL LAW OFFICE Attorneys for Plaintiff TERESA HOOD.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to stipulation, Plaintiff Teresa Hood and Defendant Amgen Inc. have announced that they wish to dismiss the remaining claim asserted in this case against Amgen Inc. with prejudice.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the remaining cause of action brought by Plaintiff Teresa Hood against Defendant Amgen Inc. in the above-captioned case, Count 6 (Retaliation in Violation of the Federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3730(h)) (Against Defendant Amgen), is hereby DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear their own costs.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.