From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood et al. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Apr 21, 1928
116 So. 647 (Fla. 1928)

Opinion

Opinion Filed April 21, 1928.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Walton County; A. G. Campbell, Judge.

Purl G. Adams, Attorney for Plaintiff in Error;

Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, Attorneys for Defendant in Error.


In this case the State was allowed to introduce evidence over the objection of defendants tending to prove a crime other than that charged in the indictment and for which the defendants were then on trial.

The entire evidence, when taken together, scarcely meets the requirements of evidence sufficient to convict and it is our opinion that the irrelevant testimony above referred to was prejudicial to the defendants.

The case should be reversed on authority of the opinion in the case of Boyette v. the State, filed in this Court March 28, 1928, and it is so ordered. See also Nickels v. State, 106 Sou. Rep. 479.

Reversed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL, J., concur.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.


Summaries of

Hood et al. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Apr 21, 1928
116 So. 647 (Fla. 1928)
Case details for

Hood et al. v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD HOOD AND RANDOLPH HOOD, Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Apr 21, 1928

Citations

116 So. 647 (Fla. 1928)
116 So. 647