From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Honig v. Riot Blockchain, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 23, 2020
20 CIVIL 2808 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 23, 2020)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 2808 (NRB)

11-23-2020

BARRY C. HONIG, and GRQ CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated November 20, 2020, because Riot had no duty to indemnify plaintiffs for expenses arising out of the Legal Proceedings, Count Two of the Amended Complaint for breach of contract is dismissed. Because Count One for declaratory relief is premised on the same argument for breach, it likewise must fail. See Kinsey v. Cendant Corp., 521 F. Supp. 2d 292, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Riot also requested that the Court award it reasonable attorneys' fees should it prevail on its motion. ECF No. 41 at 11. The SPAs provide "the prevailing party" in "an action or proceeding to enforce any provisions" of the SPAs "shall be reimbursed by the other party for its reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses incurred with the investigation, preparation and prosecution of such action or proceeding." SPA § 5.9. As Riot has prevailed on its motion and consequently in this action, the request for reasonable attorneys' fees is appropriate and granted; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

November 23, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Honig v. Riot Blockchain, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 23, 2020
20 CIVIL 2808 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Honig v. Riot Blockchain, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BARRY C. HONIG, and GRQ CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. RIOT BLOCKCHAIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 23, 2020

Citations

20 CIVIL 2808 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 23, 2020)