From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Homes v. Gary Short & Lisa Short

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 30, 2013
2:13-cv-0913 TLN KJN PS (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2013)

Opinion


BLUE MOUNTAIN HOMES, LCC, Plaintiff, v. GARY SHORT & LISA SHORT, Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-0913 TLN KJN PS United States District Court, E.D. California. May 30, 2013

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         On May 10, 2013, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that this unlawful detainer action, originally removed to this court by pro se defendant Gary Short, be remanded to state court. (ECF No. 8.) On May 28, 2013, defendant Gary Short filed a "Notice of Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice" pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. 9.) However, that notice of dismissal is procedurally improper, because only a plaintiff, and not a defendant, can dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1). Assuming that the district judge adopts the undersigned's findings and recommendations, the action will be remanded to state court where plaintiff would have an opportunity to continue to pursue the action against defendants.

This case proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Gary Short's notice of dismissal (ECF No. 9), construed as a request for dismissal of the action, is DENIED as procedurally improper.


Summaries of

Homes v. Gary Short & Lisa Short

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 30, 2013
2:13-cv-0913 TLN KJN PS (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Homes v. Gary Short & Lisa Short

Case Details

Full title:BLUE MOUNTAIN HOMES, LCC, Plaintiff, v. GARY SHORT & LISA SHORT…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 30, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-0913 TLN KJN PS (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2013)