From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Home Mutual Insurance Company v. Callaway

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 21, 1966
151 S.E.2d 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

42214.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 12, 1966.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1966.

Action on insurance policy. Wilkes Superior Court. Before Judge Stevens.

Erwin, Birchmore Epting, Denny C. Galis, Wilbur A. Orr, for appellant.

Walton Hardin, for appellee.


The error enumerated in this appeal is the overruling of the defendant's motion for judgment non obstante veredicto as to the award of penalties and attorney's fees. The insured's proof of loss under the homeowner's insurance policy claimed a loss of $3,214.47, and suit was brought to recover that amount. The verdict returned for the insured's loss was for $2,300. "Where the verdict in a suit on an insurance policy is for substantially less than the amount claimed in the proof of loss and less than the amount demanded in the petition, no recovery for damages and attorney's fees is authorized." Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Boney, 113 Ga. App. 459 ( 148 S.E.2d 457).

The trial court erred in overruling the defendant's motion for judgment non obstante veredicto as to the award of penalties and attorney's fees.

Judgment reversed. Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 12, 1966 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1966.


Summaries of

Home Mutual Insurance Company v. Callaway

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 21, 1966
151 S.E.2d 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Home Mutual Insurance Company v. Callaway

Case Details

Full title:HOME MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CALLAWAY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 21, 1966

Citations

151 S.E.2d 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966)
151 S.E.2d 182

Citing Cases

United Insurance Co. v. Moore

95, and the amount recovered was $4,760.73..." Appellant relies upon Home Mut. Ins. Co. v. Callaway, 114 Ga.…