From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holzman v. Comm'n on Judicial Conduct

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 6, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 91761 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Motion No: M-4508

12-06-2011

In the Matter of Holzman v. The Commission on Judicial Conduct


Stay denied. All concur except , J., who dissents as follows:

I respectfully dissent because in my view we should grant petitioner's application, in part, to the extent of staying any hearing by the Commission until the conclusion of the criminal trial of Michael Lippman, Esq. Should Mr. Lippman be acquitted of all the charges against him, he would be available to testify in the proceedings against Surrogate Holzman.

In my view, this is the more prudent course of action at this point in time. It will allow the Surrogate to present a complete defense and will remove any argument that we are being precipitous in allowing the proceeding to go forward against the duly elected Surrogate when he is precluded from calling his chosen fact witness.

Before: Catterson, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Richter, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


Summaries of

Holzman v. Comm'n on Judicial Conduct

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 6, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 91761 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Holzman v. Comm'n on Judicial Conduct

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Holzman v. The Commission on Judicial Conduct

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 91761 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)