From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 20, 1994
646 So. 2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-1663.

December 20, 1994.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County; Jere Tolton, Judge.

Lawrence Keefe, Anchors, Foster, McInnis Keefe, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Richard Parker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant, Dominiche Vance Holt, challenges the imposition of adult sanctions without a written order sufficiently addressing the statutory criteria and requirement of section 39.059(7)(c) and (d). We agree with appellant that the court failed to comply with the statute, and reverse and remand for resentencing in compliance with section 39.059(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes. Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla. 1993); Clayton v. State, 636 So.2d 596 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Appellant also challenges the order imposing restitution as a condition of probation. To the extent that the order purports to delegate responsibility to the probation officer to schedule restitution payments, we find the order to be in error. Smith v. State, 613 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Upon resentencing, the trial court shall comply with the dictates of Smith, supra.

WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 20, 1994
646 So. 2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Holt v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOMINICHE VANCE HOLT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 20, 1994

Citations

646 So. 2d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)