From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Rushing

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 13, 2012
381 P.3d 658 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 58091.

09-13-2012

Larry HOLT, D.C, Individually; Decatur & Craig Chiropractic, Inc., A Nevada Corporation; and Rick Hallgren, D.C, Appellants, v. Patricia RUSHING, Respondent.

Backus, Carranza & Burden Prince & Keating, LLP


Backus, Carranza & Burden

Prince & Keating, LLP

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS CROSS–APPEAL

On July 6, 2012, this court entered an order approving the parties' stipulation to dismiss the appeal in this case, noting that the cross-appeal was not addressed in the stipulation, and redesignating the cross-appeal as the appeal in this proceeding. Subsequently, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the cross-appeal, which is now designated as the appeal. Having reviewed the parties' stipulation, it is approved, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Holt v. Rushing

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 13, 2012
381 P.3d 658 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Holt v. Rushing

Case Details

Full title:Larry HOLT, D.C, Individually; Decatur & Craig Chiropractic, Inc., A…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Sep 13, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 658 (Nev. 2012)