Holt v. Ford Motor Credit

1 Citing case

  1. Islam v. Lee's Motors, Inc.

    17-cv-03955 (DLI)(VMS) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2018)   Cited 2 times

    Case law from other circuits and New York state also support this conclusion. See Rosa v. Cutter Pontiac Buick GMC of Waipahu, Inc., 255 F. App'x 281, 282-83 (9th Cir. 2007) (holding that an automobile dealer is not liable for alleged violations of TILA where consumers never signed a credit sales contract and, thus, never consummated a credit transaction for the purchase of a vehicle); MacDermid v. Discover Fin. Servs., 488 F.3d 721, 733-34 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that a wife's fraudulent conduct in obtaining a credit card in both her and her husband's name did not render the creditor liable for failing to send the husband the required TILA disclosures); Holt v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 2007 WL 2601083, at *5 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 7, 2007), aff'd, 275 F. App'x 553 (7th Cir. 2008) (holding that a forged contract is void and creates no TILA obligation on the creditor where a dealership allegedly forged a signature and changed the price on a RIC); Anthony v. Anthony, 642 F. Supp.2d 1366, 1373 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (denying TILA claim based on forged mortgage documents); Monogram Credit Card Bank of Georgia v. Morris, 2002 WL 31360695, at *6-7 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. May 10, 2002) (dismissing TILA claim absent a valid contract where an imposter applied for a credit card using the identity of the claimant).