Holt v. Ford Motor Credit

3 Citing cases

  1. Lord v. Beam

    Case No. 18-CV-351-JPS (E.D. Wis. Feb. 6, 2019)   Cited 2 times

    Rather, all of the evidence is to the contrary. See Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) ("When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment."); Holt v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 275 F. App'x 553, 554 (7th Cir. 2008) (no genuine dispute of fact where plaintiff produced an affidavit swearing that he did not sign a contract and all other evidence in the record suggested he did). Plaintiff fully admits to a disgusting sexual display towards Stoffel.

  2. Bennett v. Sobek

    336 F. Supp. 3d 933 (E.D. Wis. 2018)   Cited 1 times

    Instead, the Court concludes that because all of the other evidence in the case indicates that the beating did not occur, including several contemporaneous medical records and Plaintiff's own failure to complain at the time, no reasonable jury could believe his present theory. SeeScott v. Harris , 550 U.S. 372, 380, 127 S.Ct. 1769, 167 L.Ed.2d 686 (2007) ("When opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary judgment."); Holt v. Ford Motor Credit Co. , 275 F. App'x 553, 554 (7th Cir. 2008) (no genuine dispute of fact where plaintiff produced an affidavit swearing that he did not sign a contract and all other evidence in the record suggested he did). As a result, Plaintiff's excessive force claim must fail.

  3. Franklin v. Blackman

    13-cv-470 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 25, 2014)   Cited 3 times
    Noting that " Scott ’s standard is exceptionally high"

    See Barrett v. Wallace, 570 F. App'x 598, 601 (7th Cir. 2014) (video recording); Rivera v. Jimenez, 556 F. App'x 505, 506-07 (7th Cir. 2014) (44-minute video); Gillis v. Pollard, 554 F. App'x 502, 506 (7th Cir. 2014) (video recordings); Johnson v. Moeller, 269 F. App'x 593, 596 (7th Cir. 2008) (security tape). In Holt v. Ford Motor Co., a plaintiff sued a car dealership for repossessing his vehicle after he defaulted on his purchase contract. 275 F. App'x 553, 554 (7th Cir. 2008). The plaintiff argued that the dealership forged his signature on the purchase contract and that he, instead, bought the vehicle under an oral contract at a lower price.