From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Brown

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Dec 12, 2023
Civil Action 3:23CV653 (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:23CV653

12-12-2023

RUSH JACK SAMUEL HOLT, III, Plaintiff, v. JAMES LAMONT BROWN, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

John A. Gibney, Jr. Senior United States District Judge.

By Memorandum Order entered on October 26, 2023, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order to return a signed consent to collection of fees form. Instead, he simply returned the form unsigned. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiffs conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Holt v. Brown

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Dec 12, 2023
Civil Action 3:23CV653 (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Holt v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RUSH JACK SAMUEL HOLT, III, Plaintiff, v. JAMES LAMONT BROWN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Date published: Dec 12, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 3:23CV653 (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2023)