From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Sessions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Feb 28, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-0302 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-0302 (UNA)

02-28-2018

JOSHUA P.H. HOLT, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

This court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) ("[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact."). Having reviewed the plaintiff's complaint carefully, including assertions that the plaintiff hears voices which are "being used to try to drive [him] insane," Compl. at 9, the Court concludes that what factual contentions are identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible.

The Court will grant plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), 1915A(b)(1). An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: 2/28/18

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Holt v. Sessions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Feb 28, 2018
Civil Action No. 18-0302 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Holt v. Sessions

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA P.H. HOLT, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-0302 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2018)