From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Remark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 29, 2018
Civil No. 18-cv-0181 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No. 18-cv-0181 (SRN/HB)

03-29-2018

Aiyetoro Aheen Holmes, Petitioner, v. Megan Remark; Melissa Westbrook; and Attorney John L. Kirwin, Respondents.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Aiyetoro Aheen Holmes [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state remedies.
3. Holmes's application to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED.
4. Holmes's motion to cease and desist [Doc. No. 3] is DENIED.
5. No certificate of appealability is issued.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: March 29, 2018

s/Susan Richard Nelson

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Holmes v. Remark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 29, 2018
Civil No. 18-cv-0181 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Holmes v. Remark

Case Details

Full title:Aiyetoro Aheen Holmes, Petitioner, v. Megan Remark; Melissa Westbrook; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Mar 29, 2018

Citations

Civil No. 18-cv-0181 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2018)