From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Holmes

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 9, 1949
337 Ill. App. 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)

Opinion

Term No. 49F7. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed May 9, 1949 Released for publication June 9, 1949

APPEAL AND ERROR, § 375.1amendments to notice of appeal. Amendments to notice of appeal, while permitted, relate back to time of filing of original notice and cannot include orders entered subsequent to that time; hence husband appealing from decree in divorce suit could not, by amendment to notice of appeal, have reviewed an order entered by trial court subsequent to date of filing of original notice, especially where amended notice was filed more than 90 days after filing of original one (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, ch. 110, par. 259.33; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 105.33).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Saline county; the Hon. HAROLD L. ZIMMERMAN, Judge, presiding.

Decree of circuit court of Saline county filed June 9, 1948, is hereby reversed and remanded for new trial. Proceedings pursuant to the amended notice of appeal from the order of November 18, 1948, are hereby dismissed. Heard in this court at the February term, 1949.

Rumsey Dennis, for appellant;

Clarence Kammermann, for appellee;

Clarence Kammermann and Hugh E. Johnson, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed May 9, 1949; released for publication June 9, 1949.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Holmes

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
May 9, 1949
337 Ill. App. 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)
Case details for

Holmes v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:Robert H. Holmes, Appellant, v. Florence Garrett Holmes, Appellee

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: May 9, 1949

Citations

337 Ill. App. 648 (Ill. App. Ct. 1949)
86 N.E.2d 275

Citing Cases

Holmes v. Kammerman

The court at the same time granted the cross-appeal of Florence Holmes and reversed the decree of divorce.…

Hanen v. Willis

And some courts treat an error in the notice of appeal as one of form rather than substance. Holmes v.…