From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Goodrich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 15, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13CV421 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 15, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:13CV421

12-15-2014

DESMON HOLMES, Petitioner, v. BARRY GOODRICH, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 23) of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. regarding the Motion of Petitioner Desmon Holmes to Stay the Proceedings Under Civil Rule 13.3 and in the Alternative Stay/Abeyance (Doc.#19). The Magistrate Judge recommended that Petitioner's Motion to Stay be denied

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Petitioner has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981).

Therefore, the Court adopts in full the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 23) and denies the Motion to Stay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 12/15/2014

S/Christopher A. Boyko

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Holmes v. Goodrich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 15, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13CV421 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Holmes v. Goodrich

Case Details

Full title:DESMON HOLMES, Petitioner, v. BARRY GOODRICH, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 15, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 1:13CV421 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 15, 2014)