From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 28, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2356 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2356.

February 28, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 28 day of February, 2008, upon consideration of the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED;

3. Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

4. The case is REMANDED in accordance with the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Linda K. Caracappa.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 28, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2356 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Holmes v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GERALDINE HOLMES, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 28, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2356 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2008)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Berryhill

The distinction between the opinion Dr. DeCarlo provided on the Medical Source Statement and the two slightly…