From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holme v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1898
50 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1898)

Opinion

Argued March 2, 1898

Decided April 26, 1898

Howard A. Sperry, appellant, in person.

John H. Henshaw for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

All concur, except PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY and MARTIN, JJ., who dissent on the ground the question is not reviewable in this court.


Summaries of

Holme v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1898
50 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1898)
Case details for

Holme v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:MAUD VAN BUREN HOLME, Respondent, v . JOHN STEWART et al., Defendants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 26, 1898

Citations

50 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1898)
50 N.E. 1118

Citing Cases

Parish v. Parish

This has been so held in three recent cases. ( Holme v. Stewart, 155 N.Y. 695; Kingsland v. Fuller, 157 N.Y.…

Merges v. Ringler

First. The order is reviewable, and the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. All concur (GRAY, J., upon…