From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holman v. Dean

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
May 10, 2013
Case No. 5:13cv52/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 5:13cv52/LAC/EMT

05-10-2013

GEORGE HOLMAN, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY DEAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 1, 2013 (doc. 6). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's state law claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's right to assert it in state court.

3. This action is DISMISSED as to Plaintiff's remaining claims for lack of jurisdiction due to Plaintiff's failure to raise a non-frivolous federal claim.

______________

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Holman v. Dean

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
May 10, 2013
Case No. 5:13cv52/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Holman v. Dean

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE HOLMAN, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY DEAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 5:13cv52/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 10, 2013)