From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollosi v. 340 East 93rd Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 2001
282 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 27, 2001

April 23, 2001

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated June 8, 2000, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability based on Labor Law § 240 (1) and, upon searching the record, granted summary judgment to the defendant dismissing the complaint.

Rovegno Taylor, P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y. (Robert P. Rovegno of counsel), for appellant.

DeCicco, Gibbons McNamara, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Andrew P. Zotos and Daniel D. Flynn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The work performed by the plaintiff, which involved replacing gaskets on a steam valve, did not constitute repair work encompassed by Labor Law § 240 (1) ( see, Jehle v. Adams Hotel Assocs., 264 A.D.2d 354; Urbano v. Plaza Materials Corp., 262 A.D.2d 307; see also, Koch v. E. C.H. Holding Corp., 248 A.D.2d 510, 511). Accordingly, the Supreme Court, upon searching the record, properly granted summary judgment to the defendant dismissing the complaint.


Summaries of

Hollosi v. 340 East 93rd Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 2001
282 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Hollosi v. 340 East 93rd Street Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IMRE HOLLOSI, APPELLANT, v. 340 EAST 93RD STREET CORP., RESPONDENT (AND A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 23, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 697