From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. County

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 10, 2009
Case No. 3:08-0439 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 10, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-0439.

June 10, 2009


ORDER


For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court hereby enters the following rulings:

(1) The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Stacy Swindell (Docket Entry No. 28) is hereby GRANTED solely with respect to Plaintiffs' federal claims;

(2) The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Wilson County and Defendant James Lanier (Docket Entry No. 33) is hereby GRANTED solely with respect to Plaintiffs' federal claims;

(3) Plaintiffs' federal claims against Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

(4) The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state-law claims against Defendants and those claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

(5) Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice (Docket Entry No. 51) is hereby GRANTED.

Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of a final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a).

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hollis v. County

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 10, 2009
Case No. 3:08-0439 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Hollis v. County

Case Details

Full title:ALTON D. HOLLIS and LINDA S. HOLLIS, Plaintiffs, v. WILSON COUNTY, JAMES…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jun 10, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08-0439 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

Owen v. City of Lafayette

Sextella-Wright v. Sandusky City Sch. Dist., 2007 WL 451498 at *2 (6th Cir. 2007).Hollis v. Wilson County,…

Nelson v. Shelton

Courts have routinely found that judicial commissioners are judicial officers performing judicial functions.…