From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holliman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 27, 2016
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00699-JRA (N.D. Ohio Apr. 27, 2016)

Summary

finding reversible error where the "ALJ did little more than state its requirements, and summarily assert Plaintiff did not meet the listing, even considering his obesity in combination with his other impairments"

Summary of this case from Harris v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00699-JRA

04-27-2016

RAMEL HOLLIMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq.) and for a Period of Disability and Disability Insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. §§416(i) and 423) in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Commissioner's decision, and the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh for preparation of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rules 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 17) that this Court VACATE the decision of the Commissioner and REMAND the case back to the Social Security Administration.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after service. To date, no objections have been filed. In fact, on April 21, 2016, the Commissioner filed a response to the Report and Recommendation whereby the Commissioner confirmed that she would not file objections. As such, any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED back to the Social Security Administration.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 27, 2016

/s/ John R. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Holliman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 27, 2016
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00699-JRA (N.D. Ohio Apr. 27, 2016)

finding reversible error where the "ALJ did little more than state its requirements, and summarily assert Plaintiff did not meet the listing, even considering his obesity in combination with his other impairments"

Summary of this case from Harris v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Holliman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:RAMEL HOLLIMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 27, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00699-JRA (N.D. Ohio Apr. 27, 2016)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Thus, this appears to be an improper post hoc rationale offered by the Commissioner, rather than a rationale…

Harris v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

By so concluding, the ALJ committed reversible error. Holliman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No.…