Opinion
No. 726 CA 23-00009
11-17-2023
DONALD HOLLER, PLAINTIFF, v. DOMINION ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC., AND LMC INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. LMC INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, O'CONNELL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN WALLACE, BUFFALO, MAURO LILLING NAPARTY LLP, WOODBURY (SETH M. WEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP, HARRISON (LYNN ABELSON LIEBMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT DOMINION ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC. RUPP PFALZGRAF LLC, ROCHESTER (KEVIN J. FEDERATION OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT LMC INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN WALLACE, BUFFALO, MAURO LILLING NAPARTY LLP, WOODBURY (SETH M. WEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP, HARRISON (LYNN ABELSON LIEBMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT DOMINION ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC.
RUPP PFALZGRAF LLC, ROCHESTER (KEVIN J. FEDERATION OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT LMC INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, BANNISTER, OGDEN, AND NOWAK, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Gail Donofrio, J.), entered December 2, 2022. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the motion of third-party defendant seeking leave to renew its opposition to the motions for partial summary judgment of defendant-third-party plaintiff LMC Industrial Contractors, Inc. and defendant Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Holler v Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc. ([appeal No. 1] ___ A.D.3d ___ [Nov. 17, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).