From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Burnette

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Jun 3, 2009
CV 308-090 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 3, 2009)

Summary

explaining impropriety of piecemeal amendment

Summary of this case from Matthews v. Ayaz

Opinion

CV 308-090.

June 3, 2009


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's grievance procedure claim against Defendant Burnette is DISMISSED, and Defendant Toby is DISMISSED from this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Holland v. Burnette

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Jun 3, 2009
CV 308-090 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 3, 2009)

explaining impropriety of piecemeal amendment

Summary of this case from Matthews v. Ayaz
Case details for

Holland v. Burnette

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE W. HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. FRED BURNETTE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Jun 3, 2009

Citations

CV 308-090 (S.D. Ga. Jun. 3, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Danforth

Although Plaintiff apparently intends for the Court to read allegations against additional defendants in…

Whittington v. Caldwell

Plaintiff's latest attempt to add Dr. Tedesco as a Defendant by submitting a piecemeal description of the…