From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Aug 17, 2010
CIV 10-00556 WJ/KBM (D.N.M. Aug. 17, 2010)

Opinion

CIV 10-00556 WJ/KBM.

August 17, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION


The Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on July 16, 2010 (Doc. 7). The proposed findings notify the parties of their ability to file objections and that failure to do so waives appellate review. To-date, no objections have been filed and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.

Wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (Doc. 3) is DENIED; and
3. Plaintiff's motion requesting appointment of counsel (Doc. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT.
4. Pursuant to the final order entered concurrently herewith, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Holland v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Aug 17, 2010
CIV 10-00556 WJ/KBM (D.N.M. Aug. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Holland v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SYLVESTER G. HOLLAND, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Aug 17, 2010

Citations

CIV 10-00556 WJ/KBM (D.N.M. Aug. 17, 2010)