From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holden v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jul 12, 2011
Case No. 4:10CV742 RWS (E.D. Mo. Jul. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10CV742 RWS.

July 12, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Stacey Holden's appeal from an adverse ruling of the Social Security Administration. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles who filed his Report and Recommendation on June 15, 2011. Judge Buckles recommended that the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits should be reversed and that this case should be remanded for further proceedings. Judge Buckles found that the Administrative Law Judge "failed to consider and properly evaluate all of the relevant evidence in making his determination that plaintiff was not under a disability at any time through the date of the decision."

Any objections to Judge Buckles' Report and Recommendation had to be filed by June 29, 2011. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today's date.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles [#22] is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence-four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Holden v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jul 12, 2011
Case No. 4:10CV742 RWS (E.D. Mo. Jul. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Holden v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:STACEY HOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 12, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:10CV742 RWS (E.D. Mo. Jul. 12, 2011)

Citing Cases

Girshner v. Berryhill

In its September 20, 2016 denial of further review, the Appeals Council did consider Dr. Glynn's evidence but…