From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holcombe v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 17, 2019
No. 04-19-00470-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 17, 2019)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00470-CR

12-17-2019

Bryan HOLCOMBE, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas
Trial Court No. 10-09-132-CRW
The Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 12, 2019, appellant's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal.

After reviewing counsel's motion to withdraw and brief, we conclude counsel has not fully complied with Kelly v. State because there is no indication counsel has informed his client:

1. that his brief, if any, should identify those issues which he believes the Court should consider in deciding whether the case presents any meritorious issues; and
2. of his pro se right to seek discretionary review should this Court declare his appeal frivolous.
See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant's counsel file a response indicating he has complied with the above Kelly requirements by December 27, 2019.

/s/_________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of December, 2019.

/s/_________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Holcombe v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 17, 2019
No. 04-19-00470-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Holcombe v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bryan HOLCOMBE, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Dec 17, 2019

Citations

No. 04-19-00470-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 17, 2019)