Opinion
Argued November 28, 1910
Decided December 13, 1910
Samuel M. Havens for appellant.
Ralph S. Kent for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and COLLIN, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Holbrook v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 13, 1910
93 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1910)
Summaries of
Holbrook v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 13, 1910
93 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for
Holbrook v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Ry. Co.
Case Details
Full title:IRVING L. HOLBROOK, Respondent, v . BUFFALO, ROCHESTER AND PITTSBURGH…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 13, 1910
Citations
93 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1910)
93 N.E. 1122