Opinion
No. 1:12-CV-00304-AWI-MJS
02-19-2013
AMIE HOLAK, individually, and on behalf of all others member of the general public similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. KMART CORPORATION, a Michigan corporation, et al., Defendants.
RAUL PEREZ (Cal. State Bar No. 174687) NATHAN LOWERY (Cal. State Bar No. 238141) ALEXANDRIA WITTE (Cal. State Bar No. 273494) CAPSTONE LAW APC MONICA BALDERRAMA (Cal. State Bar No. 196424) INITIATIVE LEGAL GROUP APC Attorneys for Plaintiff Amie Holak JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073) ELIZABETH J. MACGREGOR (Cal. State Bar No. 267326) PAUL HASTINGS LLP Attorneys for Defendant Kmart Corporation
[Counsel listed on following page]
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
DISMISS FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION FROM
PLAINTIFF AMIE HOLAK'S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
Judge: Hon.
Complaint filed: January 23, 2012
RAUL PEREZ (Cal. State Bar No. 174687)
NATHAN LOWERY (Cal. State Bar No. 238141)
ALEXANDRIA WITTE (Cal. State Bar No. 273494)
CAPSTONE LAW APC
MONICA BALDERRAMA (Cal. State Bar No. 196424)
INITIATIVE LEGAL GROUP APC
Attorneys for Plaintiff Amie Holak JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)
JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073)
ELIZABETH J. MACGREGOR (Cal. State Bar No. 267326)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Attorneys for Defendant Kmart Corporation
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, the fifth cause of action of plaintiff Amie Holak's Second Amended Complaint for violation of California Labor Code section 1198 and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 11070(14) (failure to provide seating) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. No notice regarding dismissal of the fifth cause of action need be provided to the putative class. Defendant Kmart Corporation may not seek to recover the fees and costs it has incurred in defending against this cause of action, provided that plaintiff does not later re-file the cause of action. IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE