From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoisington v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 17, 2023
20-cv-07845-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-07845-CRB

07-17-2023

ANTHONY LEE HOISINGTON, Plaintiff, v. RON DAVIS, et al.. Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Anthony Lee Hoisington, a former California Department of Collections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) prisoner, brings deliberate indifference claims under the Eighth Amendment, in addition to various state-law claims, against the remaining defendants for exposing him to COVID-19 while incarcerated. Those defendants moved for summary judgment in March. See Mot. (dkt. 73). Hoisington's response was due on April 27, 2023, but as of this date, Hoisington has not responded to Defendants' motion.

Accordingly, the Court orders Hoisington to show cause by July 31, 2023 why this case should not be terminated for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to respond will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hoisington v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 17, 2023
20-cv-07845-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Hoisington v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LEE HOISINGTON, Plaintiff, v. RON DAVIS, et al.. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 17, 2023

Citations

20-cv-07845-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2023)