From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hohmann v. Culver City Unified Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 2, 2024
CV 24-2139 PA (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-2139 PA (MAAx)

07-02-2024

Lucas Hohmann v. Culver City Unified School District et al.


Present: PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before July 9, 2024, why Defendants Board of Education for Culver City Unified School District, Quoc Tran, Kim Indelicato, Hilaleh Hamad, Oscar Rodriguez, Ebony Nicholson, and Lee Hanson should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hohmann v. Culver City Unified Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 2, 2024
CV 24-2139 PA (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Hohmann v. Culver City Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Lucas Hohmann v. Culver City Unified School District et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 2, 2024

Citations

CV 24-2139 PA (MAAx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2024)