Opinion
November, 1911.
Exceptions overruled and judgment directed for defendant, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, J., dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
HOHL v. KEITH AND PROCTOR AMUSEMENT COMPANY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1911
147 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Summaries of
HOHL v. KEITH AND PROCTOR AMUSEMENT COMPANY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1911
147 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for
HOHL v. KEITH AND PROCTOR AMUSEMENT COMPANY
Case Details
Full title:William Hohl, Plaintiff, v. Keith and Proctor Amusement Company, Defendant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1911
Citations
147 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)