From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hohider v. United Parcel Service

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Aug 4, 2009
No. 07-4588 (3d Cir. Aug. 4, 2009)

Summary

declining to decide whether 100% healed policies violate the ADA

Summary of this case from Dunavant v. Frito Lay

Opinion

No. 07-4588.

Dated: August 4, 2009.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, D.C. Civil Action No. 04-cv-0363, (Honorable Joy Flowers Conti).


ORDER AMENDING OPINION


It appearing that the Clerk made a typographical error in the identification of Amicus Curiae AARP in the listing of counsel, the precedential opinion filed on July 23, 2009 is hereby amended to correct that typographical error. AARP, not American Association of Retired Persons, is the correct designation. This amendment does not change the date of filing, July 23, 2009.

smw/cc: Christian C. Bagin, Esq.

Geoffrey M. Johnson, Esq.

Judith Scolnick, Esq.

David R. Scott, Esq.

Rachel S. Brass, Esq.

Perry A. Napolitano, Esq.

Mark A. Perry, Esq.

Eugene Scalia, Esq.

Rae T. Vann, Esq.

Michael D. Lieder, Esq.

Robin E. Shea, Esq.

John H. Beisner, Esq.

Brad Seligman, Esq.


Summaries of

Hohider v. United Parcel Service

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Aug 4, 2009
No. 07-4588 (3d Cir. Aug. 4, 2009)

declining to decide whether 100% healed policies violate the ADA

Summary of this case from Dunavant v. Frito Lay
Case details for

Hohider v. United Parcel Service

Case Details

Full title:MARK HOHIDER; ROBERT DiPAOLO, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Aug 4, 2009

Citations

No. 07-4588 (3d Cir. Aug. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Sowers v. Bassett Furniture Indus.

The ADA requires an individualized assessment of each employee and his requested accommodation, and it…

McCall v. Carbon Schuylkill Cmty. Hosp.

St. Luke's further argues that it was not obligated to engage in the interactive process because McCall was…