From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogue v. Verizon Bus. Network Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 5, 2022
CV 22-0852 FMO (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-0852 FMO (MRWx)

04-05-2022

Jeffrey Hogue v. Verizon Business Network Services, LLC, et al.


Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Remand

Jurisdiction in this case is asserted on the basis of the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at ¶¶ 10-11). “CAFA provides expanded original diversity jurisdiction for class actions meeting the amount in controversy and minimal diversity and numerosity requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2).” United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg., Energy, Allied Indus. & Serv. Workers Int'l Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1090-91 (9th Cir. 2010). Under that provision, “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action in which the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is a class action in which . . . any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State different from any defendant[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2).

Having reviewed the NOR, the court questions whether the claims of the individual class members exceed $5,000,000 in the aggregate. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2); Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89, 135 S.Ct. 547, 554 (2014) (“Evidence establishing the amount is required . . . when the plaintiff contests, or the court questions, the defendant's allegation.”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. No. later than April 12, 2022, defendants shall show cause in writing why this action should not be remanded for the reasons noted above. This deadline shall not extend the time for responding to any motion for remand filed by plaintiff. Failure to respond to the OSC by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent to the remand of the action to state court.

2. Plaintiff shall file a reply to defendant's OSC response no later than April 19, 2022.

3. If plaintiff wishes to file a motion for remand, he must do so no later than April 21, 2022. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).


Summaries of

Hogue v. Verizon Bus. Network Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 5, 2022
CV 22-0852 FMO (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Hogue v. Verizon Bus. Network Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey Hogue v. Verizon Business Network Services, LLC, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

CV 22-0852 FMO (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)