From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogenson v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 13, 2015
No. 05-14-00981-CR (Tex. App. May. 13, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00981-CR

05-13-2015

RORY HOGENSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 063011

ORDER

We have received Appellant's Pro Se Motion to Set Appeal Bond dated April 27, 2015. This is not the proper court in which to seek an appeal bond. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.04. Furthermore, our record reflects that Garland Caldwell has been appointed to represent Appellant in the appeal. There is no right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Accordingly, Appellant's Pro Se Motion to Set Appeal Bond dated April 27, 2015, is DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES

PRESIDING JUSTICE


Summaries of

Hogenson v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 13, 2015
No. 05-14-00981-CR (Tex. App. May. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Hogenson v. State

Case Details

Full title:RORY HOGENSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: May 13, 2015

Citations

No. 05-14-00981-CR (Tex. App. May. 13, 2015)