From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogate v. Starr

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Aug 6, 2021
Civ. 20-1295 (PAM/TNL) (D. Minn. Aug. 6, 2021)

Opinion

Civ. 20-1295 (PAM/TNL)

08-06-2021

Christine Hogate, Plaintiff, v. Warden Starr, Defendant.


ORDER

Paul A. Magnuson United States District Court Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony Leung dated July 2, 2021. (Docket No. 22.) The R&R recommends dismissing Petitioner Hogate's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner did not file any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).

This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the Magistrate Judge's reasoning.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Docket No. 22) is ADOPTED; and

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) is DENIED and this matter is DISMISSED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Hogate v. Starr

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Aug 6, 2021
Civ. 20-1295 (PAM/TNL) (D. Minn. Aug. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Hogate v. Starr

Case Details

Full title:Christine Hogate, Plaintiff, v. Warden Starr, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 6, 2021

Citations

Civ. 20-1295 (PAM/TNL) (D. Minn. Aug. 6, 2021)