From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hogan v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1889 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1889 CKD P

11-17-2015

SHANNON DWAIN HOGAN, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed October 7, 2015, petitioner's habeas application was dismissed and thirty days' leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: November 17, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2/hoga1889.fta.hab


Summaries of

Hogan v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1889 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Hogan v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON DWAIN HOGAN, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1889 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2015)